1) 58/2020 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD KHALID (Applicant) V/S The STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 24-FEB-20


2) 7189/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (frequent transfer and posting)
Tag Line:Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-FEB-20


3) 7189/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
transfer and posting
Tag Line:transfer and posting
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 21-FEB-20


4) 665/2005 Suit DR.ABID MEHMOOD (Plaintiff) V/S MUBASSHIR IQBLA KHAN (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 21-FEB-20


5) 84/2010 Cr.Acq.A. Muhammad Moosa Kunbhar (Appellant) V/S Salman Bajeer and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 21-FEB-20


6) 2271/2018 Const. P. Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs.
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


7) 2334/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Azam and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Tag Line:Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


8) 2293/2018 Const. P. Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Regularisation of Employee)
Tag Line:Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


9) 2634/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Islam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue of project employees
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


10) 3234/2018 Const. P. Habib ul Hassan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue of project employees
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


11) 3399/2018 Const. P. Imtiaz Ali Sheikh and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue of project employees
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


12) 3543/2018 Const. P. Sadaqat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue of project employees
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


13) 5410/2019 Const. P. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (probation period)
Tag Line:Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Matter:APPOINTMENT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


14) 2518/2018 Const. P. Huma (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


15) 2584/2018 Const. P. Farzana Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


16) 2729/2018 Const. P. Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


17) 3006/2018 Const. P. Ms. Nayyar Qayum (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


18) 3392/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Asim Khan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


19) 3766/2018 Const. P. Ms. Kishwar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:REGULARIZATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


20) 6589/2018 Const. P. Ms. Mehreen Safdar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


21) 7067/2018 Const. P. Ms. Samreen Mazari (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Regularization issue in PSM
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 20-FEB-20


22) 7221/2019 Const. P. Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine.
Topic: Service matters (Son quota)
Tag Line:Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine.
Matter:SON QUOTA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-FEB-20


23) 1076/2013 Suit Digri Sugar Mills Limited and others. (Plaintiff) V/S Mian Kamran Elahi and others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:In a Suit for Declaration, Injunction, Cancellation, Rendition of Accounts and Recovery, Plaintiffs had sought a restraining order against Defendants from presenting postdated cheques given as security pursuant to written agreements between the parties; or to use the same for any criminal proceedings or otherwise. Defendants opposed this application on the ground that section 56 (e) of the Specific Relief Act bars grant of any such permanent injunction; hence, no temporary injunction can be granted. The Court repelled this argument and allowed the injunction application by passing a temporary injunction and restrained the Defendants from using such cheques in any manner pending trial of the Suit.
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 19-FEB-20


24) 7120/2019 Const. P. Zamir Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) V/S Lt Cdr (R) Kashif Ahmed Abbasi and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The Additional Secretary is directed to ensure that vacant possession of the subject flat is taken over from respondent No.1 and/or from any person(s) in possession on his behalf, and is handed over to the present petitioner without fail within seven (07) days from today. Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh, is directed to pay a sum of Rs.100,000.00 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) to the petitioner on or before the next date of hearing as compensation. The Additional Secretary, Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, is directed to submit a complete list before this Court on the next date of hearing of all such quarters, flats, bungalows and Government accommodation that are in unauthorized occupation or possession of such persons who are not entitled to enjoy possession thereof. Adjourned to 26.02.2020 at 11:00 am when above named Additional Secretary shall be in attendance. Let notice be issued to Chief Secretary Sindh to ensure compliance of this order in letter and spirit.
Matter:ACCOMODATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


25) 7576/2019 Const. P. Badaruddin (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively.
Matter:PENSION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


26) 2341/2010 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) V/S The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Topic: Service matters (Pension)
Tag Line:Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Matter:REMOVAL FROM SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


27) 2342/2010 Const. P. Feroz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


28) 2343/2010 Const. P. Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


29) 3597/2011 Const. P. Mohammad Ashfaq Khan Lodhi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


30) 3598/2011 Const. P. Party-1 (Appellant) V/S Party-2 (Appellant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


31) 591/2018 Const. P. Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Topic: Service matters (Appointment by transfer)
Tag Line:Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Matter:QUO WARRANTO
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 18-FEB-20


32) 240/2019 Const. P. Usman Ali (Petitioner) V/S Sect: GOS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DIRECTION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


33) 7061/2017 Const. P. Bismillah Steel Impex (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:TENDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


34) 4101/2019 Const. P. Martin Dow Marker (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DRUG PRICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


35) 4197/2019 Const. P. M/s Sanofi Aventis Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST DECISION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


36) 5612/2019 Const. P. Health (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST DECISION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


37) 235/2009 H.C.A Hameed A.Haroon (Appellant) V/S Yousuf A.Haroon & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


38) 239/2009 H.C.A Muhammad Hanif & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Hameed A.Haroon & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


39) 17/2020 Criminal Appeal Mohsin alias (Appellant) V/S THe State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Criminal Trial ( Bail )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


40) 18/2020 Criminal Appeal NOOR HASSAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


41) 114/1998 Criminal Appeal Rawat and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 17-FEB-20


42) 5920/2015 Const. P. Kainat Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPLEMENTATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 13-FEB-20


43) 2157/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Shaikh. (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Judgment passed by Hon???ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi in the petitions filed to challenge the Combined Competitive Examination 2003 (CCE-2003) conducted by Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC). The Hon???ble Judges constituted a High Powered Inquiry Commission to probe and submit the report to the competent authority.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 13-FEB-20


44) 486/2018 Criminal Appeal MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O SHER MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:The test for weighing the evidence of identification proceedings is to first assess the ???system variables???, i.e. the precautions taken at the test identification parade, and then to assess the ???estimator variables??? i.e. the capacity and ability of the eye-witness to identify the accused in the circumstance of the case. Rel. Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State (2019 SCMR 956) and The matter of Kanwar Anwaar Ali (PLD 2019 SC 488).
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 12-FEB-20


45) 9013/2018 Const. P. Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable.
Topic: Service matters (Fake Appointment)
Tag Line:Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 12-FEB-20


46) 7563/2018 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (Contract employee)
Tag Line:Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed.
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 11-FEB-20


47) 941/2013 Suit Ms. Rehana Ahson & Another (Plaintiff) V/S Mr. Zulfiqar Mohammad (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 11-FEB-20


48) 5682/2014 Const. P. Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed.
Tag Line:Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed.
Matter:IMPLEMENTATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 10-FEB-20


49) 12/2020 I. A Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Habib Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BANKING
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 10-FEB-20


50) 23/2011 Adm. Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A and another (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RECOVERY OF AMOUNT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 07-FEB-20


51) 8300/2019 Const. P. Mst. Safia (Petitioner) V/S Hameed Ahmed and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST WARRANT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 07-FEB-20


52) 1/2017 Cr.Acq.A. Ali Muhammad (Appellant) V/S Learned Addl Session JUdge (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 07-FEB-20


53) 22/2020 Cr.Acq.A. IMRAN FAIZ (Appellant) V/S YED ASAD ALI SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 07-FEB-20


54) 635/2019 Cr.Misc. Sikandar Ali & others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 07-FEB-20


55) 18/2016 Cr.Acq.A. Nazar Hussain (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Murtaza & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 06-FEB-20


56) 52/2020 Const. P. Habib Ur Rehman ( Khi To Hyd ) (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 06-FEB-20


57) 113/2018 Criminal Appeal Khadim Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 06-FEB-20


58) 16/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Khawand Bux (Appellant) V/S Allah Dino & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 04-FEB-20


59) 340/2013 Const. P. M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed.
Topic: Service matters (Proforma Promotion)
Tag Line:proforma promotion
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


60) 37/2019 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Tayab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


61) 57/2019 Criminal Appeal Shabbir Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


62) 70/2019 Criminal Appeal Ahmed & Others (Appellant) V/S Faiz Muhamamd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


63) 71/2019 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Bux (Appellant) V/S The State & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


64) 74/2012 Cr.Rev Ali Sher Rahu (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


65) 101/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Muhammad Saleh (Appellant) V/S Manzoor & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


66) 113/2012 Cr.Rev Mst: Jannat (Applicant) V/S Mazhar and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


67) 1390/2019 Cr.Bail Muhammad Asif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


68) 1420/2019 Cr.Bail Muhammad Asif (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 03-FEB-20


69) 31/2020 Cr.Bail ABDUL RAZZAQUE (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 31-JAN-20


70) 157/2016 Cr.Acq.A. Humayon Khan Mandukhail (Appellant) V/S Latif Afghan & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 31-JAN-20


71) 1239/2019 Cr.Bail Yameen & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 31-JAN-20


72) 5/2018 Cr.Rev Jahanzaib Khan (Applicant) V/S Qamar Zaman & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


73) 33/2013 Cr.Acq.A. Muhamamd Essa (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Yaseen & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


74) 37/2019 Cr.Acq.A. Muhammad Shahid (Appellant) V/S Learned Judge MTTC / Ist A.S.J. Hyd & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


75) 2022/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


76) 2531/2019 Const. P. Mst Shabiran @ Saeeda &another (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


77) 2613/2019 Const. P. Dilawar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 30-JAN-20


78) 6382/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Jibran Nasir & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Police case
Matter:AGAINST SECTION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Order Date: 29-JAN-20


79) 232/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Siddique and Others (Petitioner) V/S Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 29-JAN-20


80) 530/2018 Const. P. Nihal Khan (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 29-JAN-20


81) 2631/2019 Const. P. Asadullah (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 29-JAN-20


82) 1044/2019 Suit M/s. China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (Plaintiff) V/S BST Services Bussiness Sup & Tech Pvt Ltd & anotr (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:ARBITRATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal
Order Date: 28-JAN-20


83) 108/2012 Cr.Rev Allahyar Khan alias Haji (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Muhammad alias Ali Raza and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 28-JAN-20


84) 237/2012 Criminal Appeal Master Juman Buriro (Appellant) V/S The State. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 28-JAN-20


85) 240/2012 Criminal Appeal Ghulam Muhammad @ Ali Raza and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 28-JAN-20


86) 16/2017 Cr.Acq.A. Shahid Ahmed (Appellant) V/S THe State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 27-JAN-20


87) 29/2020 Cr.Misc. Syed Ghulam raza Shah @Raj Shah (Applicant) V/S SSP Jamshor & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 27-JAN-20


88) 30/2020 Cr.Misc. Syed Ghulam Raza Shah @ Raja Shah (Applicant) V/S SSP Distt Jamshoro & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
Order Date: 27-JAN-20


89) 76/2017 Criminal Appeal Asghar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 27-JAN-20


90) 101/2016 Cr.Rev Abdul Kareem (Applicant) V/S Liaquat Ali & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 27-JAN-20


91) 134/2016 Cr.Rev Javed Shaikh (Applicant) V/S 8th ADJ Hyd & ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 27-JAN-20