1) 7941/2015 Const. P. Mst. Sabiha Ilyas (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 19-AUG-19


2) 836/2019 Const. P. Sardar Muhammad Bux Mahar Thr. Tasawar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Saman Muhammad Mahar and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The natural guardians/mother and father of minors are not required to seek declaration of their guardianship through the Court. The Court under Section 7 of the Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 is not empowered to decide title of guardian about custody of the ward.
Topic: Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (Section 7, 8 and 25)
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 16-AUG-19


3) 1141/2019 Cr.Bail Kashif Dars S/o Muhammad Usman Dars (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code,1898 (under Section 498 Cr.P.C r/w Section 561-A Cr.P.C)
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar
Order Date: 16-AUG-19


4) 2013/2015 Suit M/s. A.F Ferguson & Co., & Others. (Plaintiff) V/S Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line: In all these Suits the claim of the Plaintiffs was to the effect that in terms of Section 92 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 there is no compulsion or restriction that it is only the firm which can file its return and pay taxes on the income, as at the same time, the partners of the firm are also qualified to file their return and pay the tax accordingly and in that situation the firm would not be liable to pay any tax on the income on which the partners have already paid the tax. According to the Plaintiffs, Section 92 does not prohibit the partners from paying tax on their income as against the same by the firm. Their further case was that the inverse of what is provided in Section 92 is permitted as not being prohibited or restricted; however, the contention of the Plaintiffs is held to be misconceived as this would defeat the intention of the legislature and would rather amount to do legislation in favour of the Plaintiffs. The law as it stands today provides a clear mechanism and the principle of taxation which has to be applied on the firm, whereas, nothing could be read into the said provision . It is settled law that the function of the Courts is only to expound and not to the legislate. In view of such position, all Suits have been dismissed by holding that the firm i.e. the Plaintiff No. 1 in all these Suits was required to file its return and pay the tax accordingly; and not the partners individually in respect of the income received from the association of persons or the firm; and once the tax is paid by the firm, then the partners are not required to pay any tax on such income.
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 09-AUG-19


5) 7114/2016 Const. P. Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DIRECTION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


6) 35/2015 Cr.J.A Diloo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


7) 36/2015 Cr.Appeal Asif (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


8) 56/2018 Cr.Acctt.A MASOOD ALAM NIAZI S/O RASHEED AHMED (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


9) 57/2018 Cr.Acctt.A ZIAULLAH KHAN WARSI S/O SHAFIULLAH KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


10) 7277/2018 Const. P. Masood Alam Niazi (Petitioner) V/S The State Through Chairman NAB (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


11) 7425/2018 Const. P. Ziaullah Khan Warsi (Petitioner) V/S The State through Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi
Order Date: 07-AUG-19


12) 25/2018 II.A. Mst. Shahida Parveen & Another (Appellant) V/S Sardar Atif Ali Sanjrani & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 06-AUG-19


13) 114/2013 Suit.B AL-BARAKA BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S ENSHAA HOLDING LTD. & AN OTHER. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RECOVERY
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 06-AUG-19


14) 8/2008 Conf.Case Ibrahim (Appellant) V/S STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 06-AUG-19


15) 79/2008 Cr.Appeal Ibrahim (Appellant) V/S State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 06-AUG-19


16) 357/2019 Cr.Bail Atta Muhammad & an others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 05-AUG-19


17) 398/2019 Cr.Bail Anwar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Order Date: 05-AUG-19


18) 676/2019 Suit Fazal E Rabi (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Consignment of the Plaintiff was seized for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights of the complainant; however, the action taken was in violation of Rules 680 and 682 of the Customs Rules 2001 hence, the impugned seizure has been set aside by decreeing the Suit of the Plaintiff.
Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-AUG-19


19) 2067/2016 Suit M/s. Getz Pharma (Pvt.) Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:Through this Suit all Plaintiffs had sought exemption on the packing material imported by them for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in terms of entry No. 105 of the 6th Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990; however, the said entry only caters for ???raw material??? and not for ???packing material??? therefore, the Suits of the Plaintiffs have been dismissed.
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar
Order Date: 02-AUG-19


20) 1591/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 29-JUL-19


21) 1592/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ishtiaq (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 29-JUL-19


22) 1593/2016 Const. P. Khalid Hussain (Petitioner) V/S IInd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 29-JUL-19


23) 654/2011 Const. P. Sultanul Uloom (Petitioner) V/S Anis-ur-Rehman & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Point of reconstruction coupled with personal need. The petition is allowed, the impugned judgment of the learned appellate Court is set aside and the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller is restored.
Matter:RENT MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
Order Date: 26-JUL-19


24) 519/2019 Cr.Bail Ali Sher (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 26-JUL-19


25) 20/2018 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Sharif and another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Topic: Criminal Procedure Code,1898 ()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 24-JUL-19


26) 2847/2017 Const. P. Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad

Topic: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 ()
Tag Line:Declare that naming, renaming any street, road, government institute, town, or city after the name of any individual having no positive social, role, courage or exceptional dedication to service in ways that bring special credit to an area, city town is illegal, unlawful against the basic rights of citizens of particular areas, towns, cities and public at large.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 24-JUL-19