IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.
Constt: Pett: No.S-214 of 2009.
1. For office objection as flag “A”.
2. For Katcha Peshi.
Mr. Inam Malik, advocate for the petitioner.
Miss Robina Dhamrah, advocate for the State
a/w respondents NO.1 to 9 & 12.
Respondents No.1 to 9 and 12 have filed their respective parawise comments and they have also filed their joint statement stating therein that neither they have harassed the petitioner nor they intend to so in future, which are placed on record. The above respondents who are present in person also undertake that they will not harass the petitioner.
Mr. Inam Malik after going through the aforesaid statements, states that he is satisfied with the statements, it is therefore, that Mr.Malik does not press this petition. Consequently, this petition is disposed of on the above terms with the observations that breach of undertaking given by the above respondents would amount to breach of order of this Court.