IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, LARKANA.
Constt: Pett: NO: 128 of 2009.
1. For office objection as flag “A”.
2. For Katcha Peshi.
Mrs. Leela alias Kalpana Devi, advocate for the petitioner Mst.Rabia Khokher.
Mr. Mohammad Akram Shaikh State Counsel alongwith SIP Mohammad Saleem Arain of P.S Market Hyderabad and ASI Shamsuddin Khokher, Acting SHO P.S Naudero.
Respondent No.6 Mohammad Mureed is present in person.
At the very outset, SIP Mohammad Saleem Arain of P.S Market Hyderabad states that the statement of alleged abductee namely Mst.Rabia Khokher (the petitioner) was recorded U/S 161 Cr.P.C so also U/S 164 Cr.P.C before learned Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate-12, Hyderabad wherein the alleged abductee Mst.Rabia Khokher has categorically stated that she was neither abducted by any person nor was subjected to any excess and that she being sui juris has contracted marriage with Gul Khan Khokher on her own accord and free will. He has further contended that the Crime No.20/2009 of P.S Market Hyderabad has been recommended for its disposal under B-Clas. The SIP Mohammad Saleem present in Court also undertakes that no harassment will be caused to the petitioner by them. The respondent NO.3 SHO P.S Naudero has also filed statement. However, he has stated that neither he has caused any harassment to the petitioner or her husband or their family members nor intend to do so.
In view of this position, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition.
Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed.